Clinical and functional recovery after primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: A six-month prospective observational study

Authors

  • Amit Kumar Agrawal Department of Orthopedics, Satya Hospital and Maternity Centre, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-9631
  • Manisha Agrawal Department of Orthopedics, Satya Hospital and Maternity Centre, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Aman Gupta Department of Orthopedics, Satya Hospital and Maternity Centre, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66224/jcbior.7.3.372

Keywords:

Total knee replacement, Knee osteoarthritis, Oxford Knee Score, Functional outcome, Range of motion

Abstract

Total knee replacement (TKR) is the standard surgical treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Understanding the pace and pattern of functional recovery helps in counselling patients and planning rehabilitation. To evaluate changes in pain, joint function, range of motion, and activities of daily living over 6 months after primary unilateral TKR. In this prospective observational study, 30 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary unilateral TKR were enrolled by consecutive sampling. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at
6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, goniometric knee flexion and extension deficit, and 0–100 functional scores for walking, stair climbing, sit-to-stand, and activities of daily living (ADL). The mean age was 64.6 ± 7.6 years, and 60% of patients were female. OKS improved from 18.71 ± 3.72 to 41.47 ± 3.48, NRS pain fell from 7.69 ± 1.09 to 1.36 ± 0.78, knee flexion increased from 85.32° to 116.98°, and extension deficit fell from 11.98° to 0.92° (all p < 0.001). Walking, stair climbing, sit-to-stand, and ADL scores each improved by 47 to 51 points (all p < 0.001). Most recovery occurred within 3 months, with smaller gains between 3 and 6 months. At least one complication occurred in 6 patients (20.0%); knee stiffness was the most common (10.0%). Primary TKR was associated with substantial, progressive improvement in pain, function, and mobility over 6 months, with the steepest gains in the first 3 months. Complications were not uncommon and warrant attention during follow-up.

References

1. Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, Katz JN, Hooper G, Gray A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1672-1682.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4 PMID: 30496082

2. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012;379(9823):1331-40.

DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6 PMID: 22398175

3. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222 PMID: 17403800

4. Kamlay P, Bagewadi R, Khodnapur G, Bulagond A, Biradar BS, Nandi S. Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study. Cureus. 2025;17(6):e86944.

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.86944 PMID: 40734858

5. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859 PMID: 9460955

6. Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012;2(1):e000435.

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435 PMID: 22357571

7. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1010-4.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424 PMID: 17785736

8. Teimouri M, Salehi A, Shahsavan M, Rezaei H, Dayani Dardashti A. Effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Pain Reduction and Functional Improvement in Elderly Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Adv Biomed Res. 2025;14:86.

DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_409_24 PMID: 40958919

9. Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray DW, Carr AJ, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(1):73-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009 PMID: 25441700

10. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(6):793-801. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35155 PMID: 26033059

11. Clement ND, Ng N, MacDonald D, Scott CEH, Howie CR. One-year Oxford knee scores should be used in preference to 6-month scores when assessing the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020;32(1):43.

DOI: 10.1186/s43019-020-00060-5 PMID: 32859278

12. Papakostidis C, Giannoudis PV, Watson JT, Zura R, Steen RG. Serious adverse events and 30-day hospital readmission rate following elective total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):236.

DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02358-w PMID: 33789702

13. Zaffagnini S, Di Paolo S, Meena A, Alesi D, Zinno R, Barone G, et al. Causes of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2021;45(8):1983-1999.

DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05023-3 PMID: 33821306

14. Tibbo ME, Limberg AK, Salib CG, Ahmed AT, van Wijnen AJ, Berry DJ, et al. Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(14):1320-1330.

DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01217 PMID: 31318813

15. Akhtar M, Razick D, Seibel A, Asad S, Shekhar A, Shelton T. Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(11):2872-2879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.059 PMID: 38797451

Downloads

Published

2026-09-27

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

Clinical and functional recovery after primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis: A six-month prospective observational study. (2026). Journal of Current Biomedical Reports, 7(3), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.66224/jcbior.7.3.372

Similar Articles

31-40 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.